-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/03/2010 03:55 PM, vicente.botet wrote:
my point is if you want to "understand why" then why don't you look at the sources instead of making guesses? that will answer your question(s) and make the discussion more constructive
In a post from yesterday it was said that the arithmetic operators were not implemented following move semantics. The signatures were given, but no replay to this post has been done yet. I'm sure that the poster was looking into the sources.
Did I miss a message? I've been trying to answer everything that seemed to need an answer. I don't see any messages that include function signatures that I didn't respond to...? - -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkvfTh8ACgkQp9x9jeZ9/wRm/QCffTdaU6t7/GwTbBFMcH+r9xjI /IcAoPjXAUF6vLGe2LYsuaU0bXdNDUyn =rzWu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----