Jeff Garland wrote:
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:21:40 -0700, Robert Ramey wrote
Hmm - I couldn't resist adding my own idea for an add on to serialization.
Robert Ramey
Actually, I think that serialization extensions would be great student projects. It's real, it's meaty and it's increadibly useful.
In fact, I might suggest we go for JSON (http://www.json.org/) or YAML (http://www.yaml.org/) instead of another XML binding.
FWIW I was thinking of leaving the same XML but just generating a parallel xml schema which could be used by an XML editor. From the posts on the property tree discussion I realize that there would be interest in this. On the other hand, it would require a lot of interest in becoming familiar with arcane details of current state of the art XML. I'm sure this is very hot topic and of much interest to some people but not to me. So, that's my true motivation. Robert Ramey