29 Jan
2007
29 Jan
'07
10:37 a.m.
On Monday 29 January 2007 12:55, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Vladimir Prus writes:
I've checked in the attached (HEAD and RC). The failure in question was reported a couple of times, and nothing happens, which means we get to release 1.34.0 with it.
FYI, there is a special markup notation for unresearched failures:
<mark-expected-failures reason="?"> ^^^^^^^^^^
That's literal "?", right?
... </mark-expected-failures>
It both makes it easier for a library/platform user to spot them in the reports, and easier for developers to return and research them later.
Thanks, I'll use this. Is this syntax documented anywhere? - Volodya