6 Apr
2008
6 Apr
'08
1:10 a.m.
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Peter Dimov <pdimov@pdimov.com> wrote:
Mat Marcus: [snip]
This strengthens my view that _SECURE_SCL for release builds as a misfeature, and I still am of the opinion that, at the least, boost build should disable 'secure' STL for release variations in the default case.
If we do that, we'll probably have to encode the _SECURE_SCL setting in the .lib names, to avoid mismatches.
Yes, agreed. I was envisioning a link-incompatible boost-build feature, e.g. <safe-stl-misfeature>on/off :-) which defaulted to off for release builds. - Mat