Hello Matias, Sunday, June 10, 2007, 6:47:18 PM, you wrote:
On 6/10/07, Matias Capeletto <matias.capeletto@gmail.com> wrote:
bm::value_type
Today is definitely not my day... lets try one last time:
left : is the left element right : is the right element info : is the information, that do not participate in the set
As I've said, there are two problems with these: 1. bm::value_type is dependent on bm which is both Boost.Bimap and my component implementation detail. I don't want to put that dependency on the user's code. 2. left, right and info members are not self-explaining to users. There is no left or right side of my component. This might be better if bimap allowed to express relations between opaque structure members, something like: struct MyData { std::string Wildcard; unsigned int ID; std::string Rule; int Whatever; }; typedef bimap< set_of< string, WildcardOrder >, unordered_set_of< unsigned int >, contains< MyData, left_is< MyData, string, &MyData::Wildcard >, right_is< MyData, unsigned int, &MyData::ID >
MyBimap_t;
But I guess, that leads us to Boost.MultiIndex.
Very sorry :(
Don't mention, it happens. :) -- Best regards, Andrey mailto:andysem@mail.ru