Greg wrote:
The first question is: if my program reaches 'assert(0);', how much information is that going to give me about what went wrong? Actually, I quickly tested this and it gives me the line number and function name, so that's not too bad. Although I would definitely prefer to be able to determine the cause of the assertion failure by looking at the content of the assertion that failed, because it saves me the steps of opening a source file and looking around.
Yeah, that assert should certainly be replaced by something more informative. Will do.
The second question is, does this allow using a format string consisting of a single letter from the set ("wustp") followed by a NULL as a format string (e.g. "w\0")? It seems like it does, but again I haven't yet tested the code. I'm not sure that it's a problem, but it just stood out since it doesn't seem to fit the intent.
Works as expected. So does "%w\0", which is what I suspect you meant to write:-) --Beman