5 Feb
2014
5 Feb
'14
5:22 p.m.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Roland Bock
If someone writes an sqlpp11-connector for SOCI, the connector will depend on both SOCI and sqlpp11. But neither sqlpp11 nor SOCI will depend on the connector or each other. That is one of the beauties of the approach :-)
But wouldn't that duplicate work? For instance, SOCI has an Oracle backend. If sqlpp uses SOCI as a backend, it would have support for Oracle, and all other RDBMs for that matter. But if sqlpp has a other connectors bypassing SOCI, then what is the advantage? Would sqlpp have direct Oracle connectors besides SOCI's? If so, I begin to question the usefulness of integrating sqlpp with SOCI. Madera