5 Nov
2017
5 Nov
'17
2:45 p.m.
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org
wrote:
James E. King, III wrote:
I'm adding boost::uuids::random_device_solo which is a
basic_random_generator of random_device (header-only) type, ...
That's not a very good name. :-)
It's not committed yet. :>
... and documented it as optimal for one-off UUID generation, whereas the
standard random_generator is best suited to be reused (in a thread-safe manner) for multiple uuid generation.
You're still using "optimal" only with respect to performance. It's never optimal for random numbers to not be cryptographically secure.
Issues are always welcome. - Jim