Re: [boost] [move] [variant] Some problems with VC++10

El 09/08/2011 20:23, Antony Polukhin escribió:

2011/8/8 Stephan T. Lavavej<stl@exchange.microsoft.com>:

...

[Antony Polukhin]

...

The problem is that VC10 uses move() in it's STL implementation without directly specifying namespace. That leads to ambiguity, when VC10 containers are used with boost classes.

I can't retroactively fix VC10, but at least I can fix the next major version.)

It means that a workaround for VC10 is still required. Can we just make

namespace boost { using std::move; }

I guess we should do the same for std::forward. Is VC10 move/move strictly standard conforming? This needs some tweaks in Move (what about std::move(Input, InputIt, OutIt)?). MSVC defines also move_backward but not uninitialized_move, etc. Best, Ion