"JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" wrote:
So, if I'm getting you right now, what you propose is to have a naked_text_archive without helper support nor special shared_ptr support and text_archive with both helper and shared_ptr stuff?
naked archive wouldn't have support for helpers of any kind. This is as it is now. particular archives - text, binary, and xml would include helper support implemented as a mix-in which would re-implement the runtime helper support like 1.33
Is the goal of this move to have the helper API back in place without making it part of the Archive concept?
Yes ,that would be the object of this excercise. Note that I did things the way I did as I though the issues related to serialization of shared_ptr were very unique. I would be curious to know if anyone else had problems with this. Robert Ramey
Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost