9 Aug
2007
9 Aug
'07
9:18 a.m.
John Maddock wrote:
Daniel Wallin wrote:
The standard practice with subversion is to `svn delete` old branches once they have been merged. This keeps the branch directory nice and clean (and frees up the branch name for future use). Does anyone have any objections to deleting all old branches?
I wish someone would actually :-)
The branches directory is simply huge currently!
OK, I just removed all branches that hasn't been touched in 2 years: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/38550 We could probably remove more branches, but 2 years seemed like a safe cutoff. -- Daniel Wallin Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com