Rene Rivera writes:
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Oh, OK. Those are uploaded as a gzipped tar and then unpacked on the SF. May be the job got terminated. In general, due to issues like this, the Boost-wide results are way more trustworthy.
In that case I would suggest to dispense with the XSLT reports in SF entirely. Instead just upload the generic report to SF, and upload the XSLT reports to your server for the Boost-wide reports.
That was the plan. Just didn't get there yet.
The current situation is just confusing. And since the reports are not reliable it invalidates people looking at the latest results.
I was hoping that by now everybody goes straight to the Boost-wide reports. Any reason not to (besides a habit :)?
You are basically wasting time on the second set of test you are doing if people can't use them.
It's *the same* set of tests, but you are right, there is no reason to generate these reports now that the Boost-wide ones have stabilized and are actually more reliable.
And not uploading the large set has the benefit of saving disk space on SF ;-)
Sure. -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering