Matt Calabrese wrote:
On 11/2/05, Matt Calabrese <rivorus@gmail.com> wrote:
I'd personally prefer using the member function pointer as an explicit template argument, allowing for the calling syntax:
enqueue< &your_type::member_function >( your, arguments, go, here );
Again, with proper forms having different amounts of parameters generated by Boost.Preprocessor.
Heh, scratch that, unless someone can actually come up with a way to provide that syntax in a manner which works for all types.
It *might* be possible if 'enqueue' were a static member instance of some internal type and one were to severely abuse the '<' and '>' operators. Of course, if we are going in the direction of abusing operators we could do other things like: active < MyType > object; ( object | MyType::Func ) ( /*args here*/ ); ( object << MyType::Func ) ( /*args here*/ ); etc... -Jason