Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
On 1/31/2011 5:12 AM, Daniel James wrote:
On 31 January 2011 10:10, John Maddock<boost.regex@virgin.net> wrote:
* The testers machine builds it's own test results pages - ideally these should go into some form of version control as well so we can roll back and see what broke when. * When a tester first starts testing they would add a short meta-description to a script, and run the script to generate the test results index pages. ie there would be no need for a separate machine collecting and processing the results. * The test script should run much of the above *in parallel* if requested.
Is anyone willing to work on something like this? Everyone seems a bit scared of the testing scripts, although I thnk Rene is working on a new reporting system.
I suspect that this is largely a matter of unfamiliarity. I translated most of the report generation xsl scripts into C++ last year, and I didn't find them that hard to understand.
Oh -- but are we still using XSLT? Do you think we can easily switch to your C++ translation? -- Vladimir Prus Mentor Graphics +7 (812) 677-68-40