3 Dec
2008
3 Dec
'08
5:11 p.m.
on Mon Nov 24 2008, "Henrik Sundberg" <storangen-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Thorsten Ottosen
The library changed after its original form, and into something much better. And the change was motivated by real user feedback, something which the original review in some sense could not provide as much of.
This relates to another thread. Should libraries be marked as stable/experimental?
I like it, but I would prefer stable/new. Libraries that aren't new shouldn't be unstable, and rewrites would make the library "new" again. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com