Hi Robert ! On Wednesday, 19. May 2010 21:55:36 you wrote:
I only did this as there wasn't anything else to do it. That is, I wasn't aware that there was some "standard" syntax. I don't remember much about it - it was maybe 8 years ago. But I do remember that reconciling the gcc/msvc/borland syntax was a pain and I'm sure that's what drove the syntax I settled on.
Thanks, that explains everything. I have gcc/msvc to experiment and test and was not sure about the whole borland specific code. Maybe we can use the "standard" syntax in the future. I hope I can make a patch when the visibility support is in. Yours, Jürgen -- * Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! Ingenieurgesellschaft für * voice: ++49 511 262926 57 ! Verkehrs- und Eisenbahnwesen mbH * fax : ++49 511 262926 99 ! Lister Straße 15 * juergen.hunold@ivembh.de ! www.ivembh.de * * Geschäftsführer: ! Sitz des Unternehmens: Hannover * Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Siefer ! Amtsgericht Hannover, HRB 56965 * PD Dr.-Ing. Alfons Radtke !