Hi Peter,
my version of IBM XL C++ 12.1 still has this bug. Only the z/OS version
doesn't have this bug, as I wrote.
Unfortunately I have not been able to build a recent version of Boost on
z/OS to test, which other bugs the z/OS compiler does not have. There are
simply too many other errors, even in type_traits. In the project I am
involved, we use a (very large) subset of type_traits from Boost 1.49,
which is also the last version working on Solaris. In this subset,
everything works except of remove_bounds, as I wrote. For 1.54, not
much works on z/OS. But it is difficult to test, because Boost::Build is,
of course, also broken :-). For 1.49 I converted everything to GNU make
manually.
So, as porting Boost to z/OS seems to be difficult, just ignore me. I am
perhaps stuck to port file by file to z/OS as I need it. But changing the
IBMCPP macro to the xlC macro seems to be wise, anyhow.
Best regards,
Kilian.
On 24 October 2013 16:11, Peter Dimov
I have a similar problem in shared_ptr, as reported in ticket #8823:
https://svn.boost.org/trac/**boost/ticket/8823https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8823
However, the IBM Canada tester, XL C/C++ 12.1.0.4 on AIX, is all green.
I'd like to fix #8823, but what version should I use in the workaround? It seems that XL C++ 12.1 on AIX no longer has this [] vs [N] bug; is that correct?
______________________________**_________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/** mailman/listinfo.cgi/boosthttp://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost