Re: [boost] Solaris versions of sp_counted_base and atomic_count

Hi Peter, On 7/8/06, Peter Dimov <pdimov@mmltd.net> wrote:

Thanks. I've attached my current version of sp_counted_base_gcc_sparc.hpp. Does it look correct to you?

compare_and_swap certainly looks correct. atomic_fetch_and_add and atomic_conditional_increment both call compare_exchange, which does not exist in this file - are they meant to call compare_and_swap? I like the use of __builtin_expect - I didn't know that existed! Michael