On 9/13/17 6:17 PM, Glen Fernandes via Boost wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
On 9/10/17 11:43 AM, Barrett Adair via Boost wrote:
I like to configure on a per-feature basis, so I use these when boost Boost.Config falls short: http://en.cppreference.com/w/User:D41D8CD98F/feature_testing_macros
Looks like the best answer so far
Boost.Config actually uses the feature testing macros when available and when applicable (in combination with other things, i.e. an understanding of what the C++ implementation in question actually is known to support, regardless of what it advertises). Using the feature testing macros alone may not be what you want.
I'd be happy to used Boost.Config - that's where I looked first. But I don't see what I need in there.
Glen
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost