12 Oct
2006
12 Oct
'06
11:05 p.m.
Janek Kozicki <janek_listy@wp.pl> writes:
Thorsten Ottosen said: (by the date of Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:48:56 +0200)
We could add operator() which would return operator[]()'s result by value.
Is anybody opposed to that?
Probably. What is the point of doing that?
It would fix our users problem, so he can use () to do what he want.
More consequence then, and forward all operators.
Sorry, I can't parse that.
But in this scenario some unintended behaviour can appear related to forwarding not intended by the user.
loster and loster. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com