17 Nov
2010
17 Nov
'10
8:36 p.m.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Frédéric Bron" <frederic.bron@m4x.org> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 9:02 PM Subject: Re: [boost] review request: addition to type_traits library ofhas_operator_xxx
One thing that I've either found useful is to have an additional template parameter in addition to the parameter types and the return type, which is a Boost.MPL metapredicate intended to be applied to the actual result of the operation.
This would make type_traits library depend on the MPL library. Is it desirable? Frédéric _______________________________________________ I don't see the problem, as it depends already. Vicente