Stewart, Robert wrote:
Artyom wrote:
It is completely broken.
It is certainly deficient. We have wrapped it here with a mechanism that locates rules based upon the year, but we merely smoothed over the multiple-changes-per-year problem by picking the dominant values for a given year. It's a hack, but good enough for our purposes.
_____ Rob Stewart robert.stewart@sig.com Software Engineer using std::disclaimer; Dev Tools & Components Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
Hi Rob, Whose purposes is it good enough for? Does this mean you think there is no reason to 'correct' the API? Cheers, Luke -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/date-time-Time-zone-improvements-tp265279... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.