
10 May
2012
10 May
'12
10:26 a.m.
On 09/05/12 02:54, Nathan Ridge wrote:
I had originally planned to use Boost.Build, because I figured that it would be particularly suitable for a C++ library, and because I've come to associate Boost with high quality and excellence.
However, recently I've heard talk of Boost switching its own build system from Boost.Build to CMake (in fact, the currently active thread about modularization suggests that this change is imminent).
For all I know, this is merely a marketing trick employed by vocal CMake proponents. - Volodya