Re: [boost] async-mqtt5 is CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTED

On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 5:41 AM Kostas Savvidis via Boost wrote:

...

On 1 Nov 2024, at 17:39, Christian Mazakas via Boost wrote:

Alright, seems like no one else has any strong feelings.

I would like to register opposition, for the future, to one of the arguments which was advanced by the RM: that a recommendation to reject, based supposedly on the feeling that "the library should be something else" can be ignored or discounted. I dont know enough about the particulars in this case, maybe reasonable in this case, but I dont want to hear this argument in the future again. If the reviewer is expressing that the design is flawed, that should be weighted on its technical merits.

How would you evaluate the technical merits of such a review?

Cheers, Kostas

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost