22 Apr
2006
22 Apr
'06
7:37 p.m.
Tom Brinkman wrote:
I took another look at the library this morning and I agree with Jeff Garland that this library has potential.
I think that my objections could be resolved by removing the six-parsers from the review. Assuming the "property-tree" container is approved, lets schedule another review for these six-parsers. Either all of them at once, or one at a time.
If the library author would be willing to delay the review the parser grammers until later this year, I might be persuaded to give this library another review.
What value does the library have, if there are no parsers to get a property tree from or to write it back to a file? -Thorsten