On 11.12.2013 08:42, Ahmed Charles wrote:
I don't find either of these aspects of git to be a compelling reason to modify history, which is generally considered to be poor form in any git community and boost should be no different. Making everyone who is using boost through git deal with a non-fast-forward merge is too high a cost for simply getting to avoid typing 8 extra characters
Dealing with non-fast-forward merge at this just-post-conversion point is trivial. There are not many forks, and presumably not many people who have non-trivial local changes. May I ask that this sub-thread don't become yet another where general git advice is given? Rather, if anybody knows specific reason why rewriting history of the 'build' module *now* will create problems for *him*, please speak up. Otherwise, I'll evaluate technical feasibility (our beloved git might as well take years to run filter-branch), and if it works, will proceed. - Volodya