22 Dec
2008
22 Dec
'08
9:55 a.m.
Hello, Daniel. Monday, December 22, 2008 at 1:39:19 AM you wrote: DO> Hi. DO> I saw this in the list. I like the notational simplicity, but it does DO> it allow run-time addressing of properties (i.e. scripting, setting DO> properties from config files) and accessing properties without knowing DO> the full type? I'm planning to implement such functionality for the same reasons. In theory it is possible at least with help of 'variant' types. Also I think it is possibly to combine compiletime-defined and runtime-defined properties. -- Best Regards, Sergey mailto:flex_ferrum@artberg.ru