[boost] Re: [range] update on ADL hooks

"Eric Niebler" <eric@boost-consulting.com> wrote in message news:42421E16.5000105@boost-consulting.com... | Thorsten Ottosen wrote: | > We are already protecting classes by a namespace, shouldn't that be enough. | > | | No, because we're using unqualified calls to turn on ADL. begin() is protected by a namespace, the hook is protected by a library name. It was because begin() was likely to clash that we need another ungly sounding hook. -Thorsten