
2 Feb
2007
2 Feb
'07
7:39 a.m.
Roland Schwarz wrote:
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
These should be marked as expected failures and happily ignored.
Do you have any objections to apply the attached patch to libs/test/test/Jamfile.v2 and only mark the remaining tests as expected to fail?
I think if Boost.Test cannot be built as DLL on msvc-6.5, then: <toolset>msvc-6.5:<link>static should go to libs/test/build/Jamfile.v2, not the test Jamfile, thereby disabling shared libraries of Boost.Test on that compiler completely. Gennadiy, would you object to such a change? - Volodya