6 Jul
2007
6 Jul
'07
12:44 p.m.
On 07/06/2007 07:31 AM, Larry Evans wrote: [snip]
which looks like a typo to me since there's (...) within the superclass spec. Maybe there should be a call(...) instead? Sorry. It compiles fine in
libs/xpressive/proto/test/examples.cpp and, as construct.html says, it's a function type: The second template parameter might look a little strange. It is actually a function type, which is consistent with the (...). Sorry for noise.