
On Feb 2, 2011, at 8:07 PM, David Bergman wrote:
On Feb 2, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
[snip]
Part of this also has to do with what systems people are willing to invest in supporting. Several of us at least are enthusiastic about moving to Git. I wouldn't be so interested in working on it if it were going to be something else. I also have a personal opinion that Git is winning the DVCS war-of-popularity, FWIW.
My opinion is that Git is winning the VCS war-of-popularity - might take two years, though.
Yes, Git is (obviously?) a much better alternative for Boost than is Bazaar or Mercurial (or Darcs...)
For those of us who haven't been following the DVCS revolution closely, this isn't obvious. I look forward to seeing some more information on the wiki page (or perhaps links to messages that have passed by in this forum?) about how these different systems' features/designs relate to Boost's development process. Ron
/David _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost