24 May
2008
24 May
'08
11:33 a.m.
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 07:22:06AM -0400, Beman Dawes wrote:
Peter Dimov wrote:
If yes, we'll need two release branches, one for 1.36.0, one for 1.35.x.
Yes. branches/release will be for 1.36.0. I haven't given any thought to what the other should be named.
How about the usual name: branches/stable?
Either way: what would the procedure for the 1.36 branch be? What is its starting point,
branches/release
Maybe this could be renamed into branches/next_release. Jens