On Jul 18, 2008, at 6:59 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
on Fri Jul 18 2008, "Leo Moisio" <leo.moisio-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
The documentation for Boost.Test on boost.org seems very outdated,
I find that situation to be almost intolerable. I realize not everyone will agree with me, but IMO if a library's documentation cannot be kept up to date, the changes to the library code (and maybe the library itself) don't belong in Boost.
The OP mentioned that there's an archive out there with more up-to- date documentation, but the author hasn't copied it over to our repository yet. Well, right now I would be satisfied with adding Doxygen blocks to every public macro (or other item) as a work-around (or substitute/enhancement). Said instruction should include what supplemental headers are needed to enable the macro. (Or the author can just include those headers automatically so users don't have to worry about it.) -- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com