2013/8/28 Niall Douglas
On 27 Aug 2013 at 12:00, boost-request@lists.boost.org wrote:
I am *not sure* if anyone else has made such discovery, anyway, comment is welcomed.
What you have discovered is well known I am afraid. Indeed, proposed
Don't say "afraid", I am actually very very happy to see that this ideal was well known. I kinda think that what they called *closer execution engine* can change the way we write softwares. But I am afraid I don't understand why they wrote Boost.AFIO instead of helping Boost.Asio.
Boost.AFIO from this year's GSoC implements an asynchronous chainable closure execution engine on ASIO, and you can read documentation on how AFIO is equivalent to Google's and Microsoft's WG21 closure execution engine proposals here:
So AFIO is an extension to asio ? That helped some sort of explanations ...... Again, I don't understand why they wrote Boost.AFIO instead of helping Boost.Asio.