6 Jan
2010
6 Jan
'10
4:04 a.m.
On 1/6/2010 2:38 PM, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
Any reason to prefer this implementation to the one currently in trunk?
You mean, aside from the fact that it is standard C++03, conforms to Boost's coding guidelines, requires no compiler-specific workarounds, and is unlikely to be broken on platforms that are not being actively tested; whereas the one currently on trunk is none of those things? Not really, no. :-P -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com