4 Feb
2005
4 Feb
'05
4:18 p.m.
Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
Peter Dimov ha escrito:
In my opinion, the older version needs to be removed entirely and the libraries should be updated to use the TR1 version of aligned_storage.
The problem is that the older aligned_storage provides a different functionality than the std::tr1 (it gives you uninitialized aligned stack space.) It is a mere accident that both classes are named the same IMHO.
I think that the two classes provide the same functionality (albeit in a slightly different way) and I don't believe that this is accidental.