Wouldn't it make sense to combine boost:exception and boost:system (at least error_code and error_category stuff)? I find the error_code concept not only useful for system errors. Oliver
on Tue Oct 02 2007, "Emil Dotchevski" <emil-AT-revergestudios.com> wrote:
Is "exception" the best choice of name for this library?
I think the functionality of this library may be too specific to be given such a general name. There are several other things one might want to do in a library called "exception," the only relationship being that C++ exceptions are involved.
Do you mean the name of the library or the name of the defined class exception?
I meant the library.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost