Re: [boost] BOOST_LOCAL_FUNCTION

Giovanni Piero Deretta <gpderetta <at> gmail.com> writes:

...

int BOOST_LOCAL_FUNCTION(char c)

[ skiped because gmane believes I'm overquoting ]

struct unnamed { static void _ (char c) { std::cout << c << '\n'; return 1; }};

(&unnamed::_)('a');

It is ugly, but I find the BOOST_LOCAL_FUNCTION_DECL macros even uglier.

I disagree. It's not easy to recognise return type and arguments in your code. -- Alexander