E. Gladyshev wrote:
One suggestion that I have is this. Perhaps before the suggested exception handling is fully researched, boost::fsm should follow the well established standards by default and have the new exception handling as a predefined policy that user would have to select explicitly and not the other way around?
Yes, I have come to that conclusion also. And I don't need to change much, just the default for the ExceptionTranslator.
It'd be great. I believe that it should be more like an academic research. Perhaps you might consider producing an academic paper on this subject...
I don't have a clue how to do that (especially not how/where to publish) because I've never studied in an university. But I will write a paper. Regards, Andreas