19 Jan
2011
19 Jan
'11
1:55 p.m.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:10:35 +0000 Alexander Lamaison <awl03@doc.ic.ac.uk> wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:37:44 -0500, Chad Nelson wrote:
My utf8_t class lets you get the std::string with operator*, so it's easy to use with such encoding-agnostic functions as well.
I meant to mention this: please, no ;) Can we make it .raw() or .str() or something, anything but an operator overload?
operator* has a long history of providing the contents of a variable, even in C, and is a lot less typing to boot. But if you have any technical arguments against it, I'm listening. -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * *