On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 03:28:39 +0100 "Andy Little" <andy@servocomm.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
"Manfred Doudar" wrote
Please see my brief reply to Geoffrey Irving; ... and apologies for any apprehension caused, but its my fault - the best name to use really depends on context.
Then I guess in fusion you would do :
fusion::inner_product<SequenceA, SequenceB,Function1,Function2>{...}
fusion::dot_product<SequenceA, SequenceB> : fusion::inner_product< SequenceA,SequenceB, boost:functional::multiplies,boost::functional::plus
{};
..Back to C++, kinda, yeah .. though for the inner_product (and this is where variadic template parameters would be a nice fit): fusion::inner_product<SequenceA, SequenceB, ...> { /*...*/ } (, or whatever the syntax was - forgot the exact semantics Doug Gregor implemented) and your dot_product would be as specified. Cheers, -- Manfred Doudar - Research Engineer National ICT Australia - Canberra Research Lab | www.nicta.com.au Research School of Information Sciences and Engineering (RSISE) The Australian National University - Canberra, ACT 0200 AUSTRALIA