30 Oct
2008
30 Oct
'08
2:23 p.m.
However, we can make it much nicer, e.g.:
for (vertex_iterator pv,ve = xxx(pv,vertices(g)); pv != ve; ++pv) { ... }
My only problem is how to spell xxx. The attached proof-of-concept uses operator%, but I don't feel particularly good about that choice either. Ideas?
Should the operation generalize? Would this also be a use case? T a, b, c = xxx(a, b, f()); // with f() -> tuple<T,T,T> If it is, I don't think that operator%() will give you the same results (could your write c = a % b % f()?). As for a name, I like "truss" as in "truss this result to these objects". Just a thought. Andrew Sutton andrew.n.sutton@gmail.com