7 Oct
2010
7 Oct
'10
4:27 p.m.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Kawulak" <robert.kawulak@gmail.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:45 AM Subject: Re: [boost] [constrained_value] Constrained Value review results
From: Paul A. Bristow I also like the word 'static' - it implies 'fixed at compile time' to me, but I agree static has other possible implications.
How about "statically_bounded"?
+1. But I prefer static_bounded that follows the existing static_log2, static_gcd, ... in Boost.Math. Best, Vicente