Robert Ramey wrote:
Nicola Musatti wrote:
Robert Ramey wrote:
Nicola Musatti wrote:
******Index: basic_text_oprimitive.hpp =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/boost/archive/basic_text_oprimitive.hpp,v
I think your analysis of the problem is correct - but I think the fix is in the wrong place. Basically, I don't want to take any other than primitive types. I'll look into it. Give me a couple of days
Just a quick update: by special-casing class_id_type and class_id_reference_type like I did for version_type I managed to get almost on a par with BCB6. The remaining four regressions appear to be due to something completely different.
BOOST_STRONG_TYPEDEF has worked well on all platforms except borland. Ideally I would like to see if a borland fix could be integrated into BOOST_STRONG_TYPEDEF itself. This however would require a separate test for BOOST_STRONG_TYPEDEF which I don't have.
I see your point. I wonder if a template based approach would be much more complicated. I say this because I can't see what may be causing the compiler to generate a call to the bool overload of operator>> and I fear that finding the magic spell by trial and error might result in a considerable waste of time. Cheers, Nicola Musatti