Douglas Gregor wrote:
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 09:58 -0400, Beman Dawes wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
BOOST_NO_UNICODE_LITERALS // no Unicode literals Grrr... At least one compiler beta is supporting u and U literals, but not U8 literals.
Will that vendor be supporting U8 literals before the final release? We don't need to cope with non-released compilers.
Good point. The product manager actually thought UTF-8 literals were supporting, so maybe they will appear in the final release. We can always just define BOOST_NO_UNICODE_LITERALS until all three flavors are fully supported. That probably makes more sense. For every macro, a separate test case .ipp file has to be written and then tested for every compiler. Given the number of new C++0x features, the Boost macros will become unmanageable if they are too fine grained. --Beman