Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Rene Rivera <grafik.list@redshift-software.com> writes:
boost-root/boost/utf8_codecvt_facet.hpp is original. boost-root/boost/program_options/utf8_codecvt_facet.hpp + *.cpp is slightly modified copy. Intention is that utf8_codecvt_facet will become standalone library at some time and these files will be replaced.
Then it should be moved to boost.detail, directory and namespace.
Right. We should never knowingly allow (near) duplicate code in the repository.
Then I can only repeat the question I've asked in another email -- do you think it's OK to add a buildable library (which probably should be in regression tests as well), without review.
I never saw the question. But yes, just put it in detail. Though it's not clear to me why a buildable library is neccessary.
If you tell how it can be done
The same way as with all the other libraries (?) -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com