Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
Dave Harris wrote:
Really? My impression was that TR1 had not been reviewed in detail. When the hashing library was submitted to boost, I understood it to be the same as TR1 yet we found several problems with it. We did not blindly accept it just because it was in TR1.
Work on TR1 is finished. The hash library is not part of TR1.
I haven't been following this thread, and Dave's email program has broken the threading, so I'm missing the context here. But std::hash is specified in section 6.3.2 of TR1 (a little confusing as it's in the header <functional> but specified in the container section). None of Dave's objections to Boost.Hash applied to the TR1 specification, all of them were with the implementation or the extensions. And I think the distinction was pretty clear. Daniel