On 10/6/07, Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/5/07, Marco <mrcekets@gmail.com> wrote:
I hope to be able to post some result, soon.
Waiting for Marco's code I have updated the files at
http://digilander.libero.it/mcostalba/boost_overload/overload.hpp http://digilander.libero.it/mcostalba/boost_overload/test.cpp
Now operator<<() is used instead of c'tors, this has three advantages:
BTW the test example now looks like: int main() { typedef boost::tuple< int(char) , double(int, char) , char(std::string) , void(std::string, std::string, std::string) , int() > Signatures; boost::overload<Signatures> f; f << &foo2 << foo4 << foo3 << &foo1 << foo5; // in any order... int i = f('x'); double d = f(123, 'x'); char c = f("hello"); int k = f(); f("Hello", ", World", ", I'm Joel"); BOOST_ASSERT(i == 123); BOOST_ASSERT(d > 123.455 && d < 123.457); BOOST_ASSERT(c == 'x'); BOOST_ASSERT(k == 7); return boost::report_errors(); }