On 8/12/2011 2:49 PM, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
errr...patch? It is really quite trivial (I think...):
[snip]
or key_of< typename This::base_type > ? (Here, base_type is a typedef for
So, as I look at this (pasted from my implementation), I now wonder: Is there a difference between This::base_type and base_type in the above structs? E.g., does it make a difference whether one uses key_of< base_type the underlying iterator you're adapting, i.e., the Iterator_ parameter in your implementation.)
It doesn't make any difference in this case. This::base_type would be needed if base_type was declared in the base (which incedentally is one reason why I did not use the name "base_type" for the base iterator, esp. since we also have the CRTP derived.) Erm, hey, I'd appreciate a patch that would work out of the box without any more editing. Also would you be interested in implementing sequence_adapter? I'd really need that now to solve the issue that started this thread. Views really ought to be implemented in terms of sequence_adapter. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://boost-spirit.com