6 Feb
2011
6 Feb
'11
9:02 p.m.
At Sat, 5 Feb 2011 18:32:06 -0500, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
Agreed. I think we discussed the syntax stuff enough.
Well, just one thing I'd like to add: it would be a shame if your Boost library doesn't provide alternate macros usable by anyone who is willing to depend on the C99 preprocessor, that take advantage of variadics. BOOST_LOCAL_FUNCTION_(...) anyone? -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com